A free starting point
Free Training Provider Approval reviews your organizational and quality foundations at no cost before any paid pathway.

Approved provider route — St. Helena
Apply free for independent CPE provider review built for training organizations in St. Helena. Provider approval is free to apply for.
Start your free applicationA practical route to approval
Free Training Provider Approval reviews your organizational and quality foundations at no cost before any paid pathway.
Approved providers can describe their status accurately and align certificates, records, and verification with published expectations.
Client organizations and professional bodies get a documented answer about who reviewed the provider and against what criteria.
Once your provider file is reviewed, the same evidence base supports tenders, client due diligence, and later accreditation pathways.
Providers in St. Helena should submit a clear, verifiable file showing how quality is managed in practice.
Training companies, academies, institutes, associations, and independent program owners in St. Helena can apply when these foundations are in place.
A clear route forward
Applications are made in the secure portal so every document and message stays on one file.
The team checks that the pathway requested matches what your organization actually delivers.
Assigned reviewers assess the evidence category by category and note where more detail is needed.
The outcome — approval, conditional approval, or a request for clarification — is written to your file with reasons.
Approval and accreditation from Alta Professional Accreditation speak to CPE quality — not to permission to operate. Providers connected to St. Helena stay responsible for company registration, tax, professional licensing, and any sector rules that apply to their training activities.
Before you apply
Your application should clearly identify the organization responsible for the training offered in St. Helena. Review is document-based, but identity, ownership, delivery responsibilities, and submitted evidence must all be verifiable.
Yes. Where evidence is incomplete or unclear, files come back with specific requests. Strengthening the submission and continuing is a normal part of the process.
Approved providers keep evidence current, report material changes, renew on schedule, and cooperate with monitoring. Approval reflects a reviewed position, so it has to stay accurate.
Applications are reviewed in English. Supporting documents in other languages should be accompanied by a faithful translation of the parts relevant to the criteria.